Transition Towns

Photo: iStockphoto.com/speedclimb
Peterborough, Ont., and a handful of other Canadian cities are facing the post-oil future head on. Here's how.

In September 2008, Canada joined an emerging global movement when the town of Peterborough, Ontario, was officially declared a “Transition Town.” And this past May, members of the city council got their heads around the idea and lent their support to the project.

Transition Towns—there are now nearly 200 worldwide, including four others in Canada—are places working to adapt to a world that is being profoundly shaped by climate change and peak oil.

The founder of Transition Town Peterborough, a retired oil-executive named Fred Irwin, described it as a movement to “get a critical mass of the community working together to cope with the challenges we’ll face because of climate change and depleting global oil reserves.”

So far, the “transition” in Peterborough has focused mostly on education—about peak oil, climate change, and the shared solution of those two problems—drastically reducing energy consumption. They’ve also run a series of workshops on sustainable living, and set-up a demonstration permaculture garden.

One of the most obvious markers of this transition in Peterborough is the one-acre plot surrounding the house belonging to Sandy White and Maria Dasilva.

They’ve covered their front yard with cardboard to kill the grass, and next spring, they’ll start turning it into an “edible landscape.” White and Dasilva have also left their backyard wild and planted fruit trees, and started learning the nutritional and medicinal values of the wild plants.

The two women say they plan to put signs up around their property naming the plants and hope others will come by to learn how to add similar elements to their properties. And by the end of next summer, they hope to be 50 percent self-sufficient in terms of produce—which fits in with their philosophy of eating and shopping as locally as possible.

White and Dasilva kicked-off their project after attending a series of workshops held by Transition Town Peterborough. They were connected with student volunteers who helped with the property-design, planting and instruction.

This kind of resourcefulness, combined with openness and knowledge-sharing, gets to the heart of the Transition concept.

One of the movement’s founders, a celebrated British environmentalist named Rob Hopkins, points to the lack of structure as part of Transition’s appeal.

The Roots of Transition

Hopkins started the world’s second Transition Town, in Totnes, England, in 2006.

“When it started out, we had a few ideas of projects to start,” he says. “We put those out to people who were interested, they then went off and played around, added things, took things away. The model [of transition] keeps being changed all the time. It’s something that learns from its successes and its failures all the time.”

Hopkins also stresses that the process of transitioning towards a low-energy lifestyle should be enjoyable—“more like a party than a protest march.” In other words, the Transition message is more about what a person can do, rather than what he or she shouldn’t do to create a more sustainable future. In fact, in the world of Transition, even doom and gloom come with a sense of humour.

Participants at a Transition Town Totnes workshop wrote and performed poetry and stories to express their hopes and fears for the future:

HOPE: Alternative power for rock bands.

FEAR: Vegetarian, totalitarianism.

HOPE: Misshapen fruits and vegetables become hugely more desirable than perfectly shaped ones.

FEAR: Crocs will still be fashionable.  

Transition Town Totnes has also started a local currency in order to encourage the growth of the town’s small independent businesses. New urban gardens have sprung up in response to transition-efforts and workshops are put on to help people learn skills that have been lost in the age of power-tools (such as building homes from scratch out of local materials).

“Transitioners” in Totnes are also close to completing The Energy Descent Action Plan to help the town adapt to a world without oil (they’re counting down to 2030). The development of such a plan is central to the development of any Transition Town.

In Canada, Guelph, Ont., Dundas, Ont., Nelson, B.C. and Victoria have followed Peterborough’s example by signing on. More than 20 other Canadian communities are considering doing the same.

For inspiration on starting your own Transition Town, check out this trailer.


Comments

Funny are perspectives. Through this movement, I see only free-flowing hippies, desperately trying to scrounge a buck to fund their plate full of kitchykumie leaves because anything else is taxed, and we wouldn't want that! How you get the advancement to even consider solar, wind or any other (future) energy source, I couldn't envision. Money, and best a singularly adopted currency, is the best means for me to spend my time on innovation and trade it in an efficient manner that allows the time to innovate without worrying about growing my own food. And that is the only path to the next energy source! I must have profit. To have profit, I necessarily have to price my innovation at a level that provides me profit at a low sales level, because that's all they will be at first. When sales are great, I have lots of currency. As long as I spend it (which everybody does), it ultimately ends up in the hands of someone else innovating. I don't see the problem in that. Everybody growing just enough for themselves and the immediate community and spending their time trading with everybody else in that community hardly leaves time to put a rover on Mars and find the next energy source, let alone solve the issues one can actually see just looking around the planet. I see the social order in the vision, but what energy related greed has to do with is where my vision self-destructs. Humans are humans and if anybody thinks they can circumvent/eliminate/minimize human greed with the elimination of carbon (or pick your poison here) based energy, well let's just say 5,000 years of history suggests something quite different. If it's global warming, whoops, I mean climate change, that's the issue, it is quite possible we puny humans don't have a single thing to do with it. To anybody that necessarily thinks we do, you've been tricked into spending/wasting your time and resources, to whatever degree you do. As I mentioned earlier, take a look around the planet; spend that time on the issues you see, not on Alice. But then there's the difference in perspective; you see me playing with Alice. Further on the issue of global warming, the change in terminology should make you nervous. They tried to get you on it but realized it wouldn't get you if it didn't actually warm. Climate change........ ah, now they got you no matter what it does. It can turn green, voila, it's climate change! It's silly. If it's real, they would have realized it's climate change in the first place.
Have you folks done an article on Okotoks? It's *way* past all of this, and in the middle of oil country too.
I have to disagree with the writer (Blair). A cleaner planet needs not mean a poorer planet. Blair implies that liberal/left thinkers sideline the correct/right agenda. While there may be a point to be made here, generally it is "big" money that has a most powerful agenda, and the most muscular moneymakers on the planet do so at the expense of the less powerful, arguably at the expense of the planet itself. By their nature, manufacturers are profit motivated and conservative. Whether extraction of natural resources or the manufacture of food, goods, petroleum, drugs, chemicals, fertilizers, even money itself the primary motivation is profit which can include avoidance of taxes and land stewardship. Wealth creation can leave the poor, poorer. Not always of course: a consequence of ingenuity can be wealth. Sometimes there is the "consequence" is education, enormously enriching, especially to the poor. Regarding comments included in <....fueled by emotion and magnified by the media.....> Ruefully politics drive science (funding). Who doesn’t know about the brain drain away from Canada when scientists are "hamstrung"? As for media, Blair may by happ to know that the media is generally controlled by the right/conservative/republicans. Regarding.... Seeking sustainability in the north takes more ingenuity, science and determination, a rather good idea, one would think. Regarding...... The latter, even with northern Ontario credentials, Blair can’t possibly know. The former, Blair accepts the short term gain, casting doubt on stewardship. Unregulated industry tends to support short term (investor) gains, not long term stewardship: do forestry and mining take responsibility to land that does not belong to them? No. Not unless they are “hamstrung” Regarding...<.We should not forget the law of unintended consequences....Since Loblaws stopped supplying plastic bags (which had been recycled) the stores cannot keep Glad kitchen garbage bags on the shelf. People are now buying new, heavier plastic bags for kitchen waste. Then there is the issue of mercury contamination from florescent light bulbs. These are only two such consequences. There is a huge potential for the unintended consequece of world wide poverty due to environmental policy driven by misguided ideas.> Indeed!!!! As for Loblaw eliminating plastic bags, it sends a small excellent message with huge positive consequences. That not all educated intelligent people get the message, some do, others will follow, even with truculent purchase of kitchen catchers. Plastic bags are an easy sensible place to start action against consumer waste: the ubiquitious plastic bag has been with us for only one generation. It is a very small step to step back to thoughtful re-useable carriers, and thoughtful reduction of garbage and consequential garbage bags. Learning about light bulbs, reducing fossil fuel consumption, and helping the poorer of the planet are not mutually exclusive. That I don't wear shoes made by child labour does not put a child at a greater disadvantage. But in labouring over that shoe, the child's life is put on a course that does not enrich it's life. Finally, the fact that Blair knows about the consequences of exposure to mercury may mean they have encountered the Mad Hatter at in Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland. Isn't literacy a wonderful thing!
Hi Meribeth, I read your article with interest. Very good writing though I have to disagree with the premise. When it comes to city mayors, each has a constituency and and an agenda to push. Guelph city council for instance is beholden to a heavily leftist constituency as is Toronto. On the topic of climate change I am with Rex Murphy, Globe and Mail July 30, 2009 and they kindly printed my blurb the next day in support of his brave stand. I bought the book he recommended called Heaven and Earth by Plimer. One I could recommend by two Canadian scientists Essex and McKitrick is called Taken by Storm. Then there is Lawrence Solomon's book cataloguing a series of reputable scientists, The Deniers addresses the problem that the science is certainly not settled. This is an issue which is driven more by politics than by science, fueled by emotion and magnified by the media. I am from Northern Ontario where it snows in October and the ice remains on the lake into May (always has, still does). My relatives would be so grateful for climate change to arrive up there (only 500 miles north of Toronto) so the growing season could be longer and their heating bills would be lower. They are happy though to not have to pay for air conditioning since summers are mostly cool, except for a few hot days. That does not mean I would deny the importance of pursuing clean food, air and water and wise environmental policy to achieve these ends. While hamstringing industry might make the world a cleaner place, it will make the world a consequently poorer place, all the while having no appreciable affect on climate or weather. . We should not forget the law of unintended consequences. Since Loblaws stopped supplying plastic bags (which had been recycled) the stores cannot keep Glad kitchen garbage bags on the shelf. People are now buying new, heavier plastic bags for kitchen waste. Then there is the issue of mercury contamination from florescent light bulbs. These are only two such consequences. There is a huge potential for the unintended consequece of world wide poverty due to environmental policy driven by misguided ideas. Best of luck in your journalistic career. Shirley Blair
I think it's wonderful that Transiton Town Totnes planted walnut trees in an effort to become more sustainable and to fight global warming. What a wonderful initiative--one that other towns might emulate! But I have to say I find it disconcerting that vegetarianism causes the good people of Totnes to be fearful. It's a fact that eating lower on the food chain is less harmful to the environment and is a more efficient way to feed humankind. Nobody likes a totalitarian or a militant or an extremist, but, that said, the world would be a healthier, more peaceful place if more people adopted a vegetarian lifestyle. There's no getting around the fact that the killing of an animal is a violent act, and the lives of the majority of animals raised for human consumption is also fraught with cruelties (dehorning, castration, separation from mothers and herds, privations, confinement, etc., etc.). Many of us think we can live better, healthier lives without that. There's a lot to fear in this world, but fearing vegetarianism, or even "vegetarianism totalitarianism" (without the comma) is misplaced, and a waste of energy.
Not a surprise that Peterborough is one again leading the way; when we lived there a decade ago they were much more advanced in terms of plastics recycling than our current community (Oakville) is even now! Also their spirit of volunteerism is very strong - I expect to hear lots more about great solutions coming out of the Kawarthas.
If you'd like one book to inform yourself and others then, "Post Carbon Cities: Planning for Energy and Climate Uncertainty: A Guidebook on Peak Oil and Global Warming for Local Governments" by Daniel Lerch with the Post Carbon Institute (2007) - is a great place to start. I bought it from the Post Carbon Institute for $30. Best $30 ever spent. The book is written in the language best understood by folks living in the dominant social paradigm. Richard Heinberg's latest report on Farming is insightful as well (anything by Heinberg really).
Great article. I'm going to pass this along to the other green initiative organizations and people here in the Cowichan Valley in hopes that this could be the impetus for a coordinated, sustainable move forward for our community.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.